Advertising - Top-Tier Travel Discounts to Promote a Magazine

OF late, the news about Condé Nast Publications has been none too good. Magazines are being closed and employees are being laid off, along with other measures that echo the words of Ernest Dowson, who wrote, “They are not long, the days of wine and roses and black cars.” (O.K., that part about cars was not in the original.)

Skip to next paragraph

The jetsetter.com page, offering a chance for discounts on expensive travel tied to articles in Condé Nast Traveler magazine.

Still, executives at Condé Nast, a division of Advance Publications, are trying to move forward with ideas intended to build business at a time when the company has lost hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising revenue since last year.

An example is being provided by Condé Nast Traveler magazine, which is teaming up with the Gilt Groupe, the online marketer known for making bargain hunting the most entertaining pursuit for the rich during an economic downturn since the scavenger hunts that were so popular during the Great Depression.

Condé Nast Traveler and Gilt are to describe on Wednesday the details of their partnership, which is centered on a new Web site from Gilt called Jetsetter. The site (jetsetter.com) joins the gilt.com fashion Web site as a destination for so-called flash sales, offering members discounts on high-end travel trappings like hotels, cruises and resorts — with one catch: Cinderella-style expiration dates.

The centerpiece of the partnership will be limited-time deals that Jetsetter will offer each month, based on themes inspired by issues of the magazine. Those sales will be on products and services sold by marketers that advertise in Condé Nast Traveler.

For instance, the first such sale, which is to begin on Wednesday, will be tied to travel marketers featured in the magazine’s annual Readers’ Choice Awards issues. Among those scheduled to take part are the Yachts of Seabourn luxury cruise line and the Pierre Hotel.

The agreement between Gilt and Condé Nast Traveler includes a perk for readers of the magazine: They will be invited to become members of jetsetter.com. (Like gilt.com, Jetsetter membership will be by invitation.)

The partnership is an extension of why travel marketers advertise in the magazine, said Chris Mitchell, vice president and publisher: “We need to be a revenue-driving partner to these travel brands.”

“We don’t thank people for giving us money,” Mr. Mitchell said, referring to advertisers. “We thank people for investing with us.”

“It’s too often a cliché of our business — a partnership,” he added, “but this is a good opportunity for us to prove that return on investment.”

The agreement is the first media partnership for Jetsetter, said Drew Patterson, chief executive of the new Web site; he joined Gilt from the kayak.com travel Web site, where he had been vice president for marketing.

“Ultimately, our business is about telling people stories why they should travel,” he added. “If we want to position ourselves as being experts in the category, it’s natural to work with other people with a point of view.”

Jetsetter is still in a test mode, Mr. Patterson said, “but we felt we’ve made enough progress” to publicize the Web site and the deal with Condé Nast Traveler. His goal is to differentiate jetsetter.com from sites run by the likes of Expedia, Kayak, Orbitz, Priceline, Travelocity and Travelzoo.

“Our partners can’t go onto something like Priceline and move inventory,” Mr. Patterson said, because “it’s the wrong customers and the wrong approach for their brands.”

“We position them in a way that’s consistent with a luxury product,” he added, while at the same time discounting rates from regular or list prices for expensive cruises, resort stays or hotel rooms.

Pamela M. Feick, director for sales and marketing at the Pierre — part of the Taj Hotels, Resorts and Palaces division of the Tata Group — praised the agreement between Jetsetter and the magazine.

“Condé Nast Traveler has such an established reputation,” Ms. Feick said, so that when computer users see the name associated with the new Web site, they will “have additional confidence” in what Jetsetter is promising.

“The timing is so perfect” for the Pierre’s participation in the first sales on jetsetter.com, she added, because the hotel is promoting its recent reopening after a $100 million renovation.

No money is changing hands under the terms of the agreement between Gilt and the magazine. Jetsetter is to promote Condé Nast Traveler to its members, and Condé Nast Traveler will promote Jetsetter to its readers.

The partnership will be advertised in the magazine and on jetsetter.com; in ads in other Condé Nast magazines; on a section of concierge.com, the Condé Nast travel Web site (concierge.com/cntraveler or cntraveler.com); on posters atop taxi cabs and on the sides of buses; on display signs at Kennedy International Airport; and in e-mail messages sent to subscribers of Condé Nast Traveler and members of Jetsetter.

Condé Nast Traveler intends to keep a watchful eye on the partnership, Mr. Mitchell said, so it does not impinge on the editorial side of the magazine, which has a reputation for honest, unvarnished coverage of its subject matter under the rubric “Truth in travel.”

“We are incredibly protective of the ‘Truth in travel’ hallmark,” Mr. Mitchell said, adding that recipients of reader awards like the Pierre are honored not for buying ads in the magazine but for satisfying customers.

“They got into the Readers’ Choice Awards the old-fashioned way,” Mr. Mitchell said. “They earned it.”

Leave it to a publisher to quote an ad slogan, in this instance for the former Smith Barney brokerage house.

Sign in to Recommend More Articles in Business » A version of this article appeared in print on October 21, 2009, on page B7 of the New York edition.

Hmmm. A most interesting monetization partnership betwixt print and online media. Shall watch this relationship grow with much interest.

Brilliant: Advertisers Pay To Drive Traffic From One Place On Facebook To Another Place On Facebook

So I was reading this Comscore report

about the massive number of ads that are being served on social networks. 8.2% of all display ads on the Internet today in the U.S. are being served on Facebook. Wow. MySpace still has a small lead there, with 9.2%. Overall, social networks are serving up 21% of all U.S. display ads, and that’s with Twitter basically still on the sidelines.

Anyhow, as soon as I finish reading the report and some of the associated coverage

, I see an email from Facebook in my inbox. It says:

Hi there,

My name is Melissa and I work in advertising at Facebook. Could you forward this along to the appropriate person who does your online media buying?

I am a huge TechCrunch fan, and I think TechCrunch has one of the best Pages on Facebook. It has seen a sizeable amount of organic fan growth, and the Page content does a great job keeping users engaged. Now that we have “Become a Fan” cost-per-click ads, it’s easier than ever to expand your fan base to a much greater size. With over 250MM users, we can target by various parameters to reach the right people that would want to fan the TechCrunch Page. Having 9,000 fans is a great start, but with the potential for 50,000 or even 500,000 fans, you can make your updates that much more effective.

Running through our online tool, you can control your daily budget, ad creatives, and target audience so your ads are as effective as possible. We can also have a dedicated account manager work with you to make sure the ads are being optimized for the best performance. I am more than happy to help with this fan-growth effort and tap into the potential that TechCrunch’s Page has on Facebook. Feel free to reach out to me by phone at 650-xxx-xxxx or via email at xxxxxx@facebook.com, and I can set you up with a business account and some free ad credits to get started. Look forward to hearing from you!

And all I can think is, how did these guys manage to set up a system where people pay to drive traffic from one place on Facebook to another place on Facebook? Even Google hasn’t managed to figure that one out yet. I’ve known they (and MySpace) have done this since launching their ad platforms, but it never really hit home until today how brilliant this all is.

They even have a nice pre-created ad to show me when I visit our fan page on Facebook, and offer to let me pay via cost per impression or cost per click. It’s all so easy. All I have to do is pull out my credit card and push Facebook a little bit closer to that looming IPO.

I love the Internet.

Facebook image

Website: facebook.com
Location:Palo Alto, California, United States
Founded: February 1, 2004
Funding: $716M

Facebook is the world’s largest social network, with over 250 million users.

Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg in February 2004, initially as an exclusive network for Harvard… Learn More

Information provided by CrunchBase

I have to say I agree with this. What exactly is the point of an ad that just keeps people on Facebook? That seems to benefit FB more than the brand in question.

Unless the fan page is unbelievably comprehensive, the ad would be better served sending people to some sort of wholly brand owned property, no?

Link by Link - Wikipedia Looks Hard at Its Culture

BUENOS AIRES

Skip to next paragraph

Beatrice Murch

Eugene Kim has been hired to come up with a strategic plan for Wikipedia.

Juan Ignacio Iglesias

Sue Gardner of the Wikimedia Foundation expressed concern for Wiki culture.

Juan Ignacio Iglesias

Jimmy Wales discussed the limited profile of Wikipedia’s contributors.

EUGENE KIM left his conference here on Thursday afternoon to visit the Plaza de Mayo, where the mothers of victims of Argentina’s military dictatorship in the 1970s and ’80s march silently, their hair swept under white scarves.

The weekly marches began in 1977 to remember “the disappeared,” those who were snatched and killed by the dictatorship in an attempt to destroy the political opposition. Today, the mothers represent a movement — they are joined by supporters as they march, and there are key chains and T-shirts for sale. People like Mr. Kim come to take photographs.

“They have been professionalized,” Mr. Kim observed. It’s inevitable, he says. He should know; he is in the professionalization business. Or consulting, as it is also known.

His latest client, as of July, is the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization in San Francisco responsible for Wikipedia projects around the world, which is spending $600,000 to create a five-year strategic plan. And the conference he briefly left was the annual Wikimania gathering, held last week in the General San Martín Cultural Center, just off Corrientes Avenue, one of the main arteries of Buenos Aires, and a short subway ride to the Plaza de Mayo.

He and the other newly hired wiki-consultants tended to stick out. They were a bit older. They were a bit better dressed (O.K., a lot better dressed). They tended to travel in packs of two or three. And they were taking notes. Few had been to this conference before, and they were clearly trying to figure out where to begin in remaking a miraculous project that had become among the top five Web sites in the world, with a total of more than 330 million visitors a month, without the benefit of consultants.

In addition to Mr. Kim, there was Jelly Helm, a former executive creative director at Wieden + Kennedy who worked for clients like Nike before leaving to focus on nonprofit work, and three members of the Bridgespan Group, a nonprofit consulting firm that will help analyze trends within the Wikipedia community.

In a similar role is Matt Halprin, a partner of the Omidyar Network, a “philanthropic investing firm” created by Pierre Omidyar, founder of eBay, which in August announced a $2 million grant to the foundation over two years. Mr. Halprin, a former vice president at eBay in charge of global trust and security, was just named to the Wikimedia board.

The presence of the wiki-consultants was the most tangible sign of soul-searching among Wikipedians, and certainly at the foundation. Wikipedia has never been more influential but this success has come with burdens — errors or vandalism can resonate around the world, while the largest projects, English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia, were losing steam, adding fewer articles and scaring off potential new contributors. And to a certain temperament, great success naturally leads to the question, how long can it last?

“There is a spirit and culture that is starting to shift,” Mr. Kim said of the need for a strategic plan. “That is a necessary thing. But the question is how do you scale without losing sight of your essence.” A student of collaboration, Mr. Kim, whose consulting business is called Blue Oxen Associates, says any plan will have to “do it the wiki-way.”

“We will put those questions up on the wiki and have them go at it for an extended time and hope that we get something,” he said.

He will be soliciting proposals from the community, which will have its own wiki pages, and Wikipedians are being asked to commit 10 hours a week for four months to join task forces divided by issues of concern.

Jimmy Wales, the public face of the project, was unsparing in his criticism in addressing the conference. “We are mostly male computer geeks,” he stated, adding that there might be a measure of diversity, but only in that “we are from different parts of the world.”

As he spoke, a chart showed the self-reported demographics of Wikipedia contributors — more than 80 percent male, more than 65 percent single, more than 85 percent without children, around 70 percent under the age of 30.

Some Wikipedias are dominated by articles about pop culture, Mr. Wales pointed out, especially Japanese Wikipedia; according to one of his slides, barely 20 percent of the articles on Japanese Wikipedia are about anything else.

More profoundly, he said that Wikipedia was losing sight of its commitment to give everyone in the world a free encyclopedia, particularly people in sub-Saharan Africa. “Is it more important to get to 10 million articles in English, or 10,000 in Wolof?” he asked.

In her speech, Sue Gardner, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, was effusive in her praise for all that Wikipedians have created, but she too thought there was reason for concern.

“I believe we are pretty suspicious outsiders,” she said, adding that there were good reasons for that. “We are vulnerable to exploitation — people want to monetize the traffic that comes to Wikipedia, or pursue a political agenda.”

“People want to help us,” she said. “We need to open ourselves up to external resources. It is important we open those doors and let those people in.”

Walking through Buenos Aires, Mr. Helm said this was unlike any communications assignment he had taken on. “It is an awesome story to tell, but I have no idea what we’ll do in terms of tactics,” he said. “My hope is that no one will be able to say who did they hire to do this work.”

Mr. Kim said one issue Wikipedians would need to examine would be “the introduction of bureaucratization,” as represented by outsiders like himself. “It is important to me that my participation have a beginning and an end,” he said.

Sign in to Recommend Next Article in Business (10 of 36) » A version of this article appeared in print on August 31, 2009, on page B3 of the New York edition.

The Wikipedia riddle is a complex one. Their endgame seems to be very unclear and that's no way to run a project like this one. Do they aim to make money or be scholarly? Or is it about reach and growth for the sake of mankind? I think they need to address these key issues before they can move forward.